Yoshitomo Matsubara

The March issue of the PAMI-TC newsletter is out: tinyurl.com/49whe97t

There is a TC meeting this afternoon at #WACV2026. Drop by if you are at the conference and say hi to our new TC chair Gang Hua.

The call for PAMI TC award nominations for #CVPR2026 is out. Get those in by May 15th.

An email is being sent right now to all authors clarifying the #ECCV2026 reviewer enrolment process.

Having issues linking your DBLP profile to your OpenReview profile? The DBLP or other personal links, such as Google Scholar, are NOT required but are highly recommended.

For more info check out eccv.ecva.net/Conferences/...

a red warning light is lit up in front of a building ALT: a red warning light is lit up in front of a building

The #ECCV2026 paper registration deadline is THIS WEEK!

NO registration by the deadline → NO submission. NO exceptions.
Deadline details are available on the webpage.

Deadlines: eccv.ecva.net/Conferences/...

Likewise! Can't wait for 2028 (actually 2027 😁) to work with you more closely

Thank you!😆

Thank you for the recognition!

It's always a team effort and I want to thank teams I closely worked/ing with, especially PCs, IEEE, and OpenReview teams👏👏👏

#CVPR2026 final decisions are out!
Available for now only via email. Good luck🤞

Machine learning is an *international community*. Every community is based on mutual trust and respect. But communities are not robust to betrayals of these principles.

Protect our community by reporting, e.g., review collusion or submission deanonymization via this form 👇

We really need to think about slowing down for better science at first

I think that the flood of submissions like 10x more submissions are not making 10x more meaningful progress in community

Mark Obozov on X: "@yoshitomo_cs What’s the issue here? As long as reviewers follow the selected policy and provide qualitative feedback, this should be fine. In fact, situations where an experienced postdoc delegates reviewing tasks to students seem far more problematic. For context, I’m a high school student," / X @yoshitomo_cs What’s the issue here? As long as reviewers follow the selected policy and provide qualitative feedback, this should be fine. In fact, situations where an experienced postdoc delegates reviewing tasks to students seem far more problematic. For context, I’m a high school student,

Even a (self-claimed) high schooler is reviewing 6 papers

We should address the issue NOW

x.com/i/status/202...

Yeah, probably. We should cap submissions instead of relying on them

a man is holding a gun in front of a window with the words `` not again ! '' ALT: a man is holding a gun in front of a window with the words `` not again ! ''

Looked through my #ICML2026 AC batch and assigned reviewers

It's disappointing for me to see that there are MS and undergrad students assigned several papers (max: 6 papers?)😮‍💨

This is a repeated issue at ML conferences, and we could have excluded them by checking OR profiles

Check out what’s new at #ECCV2026 Malmo 🇸🇪

Full details: eccv.ecva.net/Conferences/...

The February issue of the PAMI-TC newsletter is out: tinyurl.com/4w4d6xjk

Inside is a call for motions for #WACV2026, a few open calls for #CVPR2026, and a bunch of other misc. vision items to consider.

The #ECCV2026 Malmo 🇸🇪 call for papers is now available. Check it out!

Call for Papers: eccv.ecva.net/Conferences/...

Decided to wait until the paper is accepted 😀

Feeling sick for the last few days
at the worst timing this year...

From my experience, the most critical component would be a high-quality, LOCAL model that accurately extracts the list of references from a PDF file as is, which I failed to identify for years

Then, we can run reference APIs like Ai2 Semantic Scholar or DBLP

LM-powered APIs cannot be options

A surge in the number of OpenReview notifications made me feel the end of holiday season🚀

The January issue of the PAMI-TC newsletter is out: tinyurl.com/2mpkx4zr

Congratulations to Gang Hua, who took over as TC Chair on the 1st!

I feel comments like CFBR won't be either viral or reach someone beyond their follower network

Hmm, my feed shows "person X {likes, commented on, reposted} this"

I don't see the advantage of comment claimed in the screenshot, unless LinkedIn prioritize comments over repost in feed

Could you clarify what you mean by
> To see reposts, you need to subscribe to a person, for comments it's enough to click on the post.
?

On LinkedIn, isn't visibility of comment the same as that of repost? i.e., only followers may see them in timeline
(ignoring the priority)

CFBR, a unique LinkedIn culture that I still don't understand in 2026

Why does it exist? Does LinkedIn algorithm indeed boost the visibility of the post with a comment more than one with a repost?

My first update this year 🎍

I was appointed to serve as Technical Chair for CVPR 2028 (@cvprconference.bsky.social )

We are also looking for an technical assistant!
Check the last PAMI TC newsletter from @wjscheirer.bsky.social if you're interested

Happy new year!

Wishing you all a productive, fruitful year
My 2026 will be a "warm up" year🔥

Hmm, I don't understand people having APIs write sections or papers

Writing papers myself is very fun

Incentives 2026 All authors will have to register as Reviewers or meta-reviewers (Area Chairs-ACs) on ARR (if you are already serving as Senior Area Chair (SAC), this is not necessary). Assignments will be made subse...

📢 ARR Jan 2026
All authors must register as reviewers or ACs by Jan 7, 2026 (SACs exempt).
AC checklists due Jan 16.
Reviewer checklists due Jan 21.
Reviews due Feb 7 and meta-reviews due Mar 3.
🔗 aclrollingreview.org/incentives2026
#ARR #ACL #NLProc

Yes, it will be helpful if IJCAI publicly share transparent before-/after-PPI analysis like
- distributions of countries of authors
- percentage of paid submissions
- distributions of half/full/no registration waiver
- user feedback about review quality
- changes in registration fee
- etc