Stephanie Eckman's Avatar

Stephanie Eckman

@stephnie

I collect high quality data for social science and model training statistics, data science, surveys, cats, biking, urbanism www.stepheckman.com

369
Followers
166
Following
46
Posts
24.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Stephanie Eckman @stephnie

NLPOR workshop at COLM

NLPOR workshop at COLM

ChatGPT generated image for the happy hour event after the workshop

ChatGPT generated image for the happy hour event after the workshop

are you attending @colmweb.org πŸ¦™ psst, don't miss our First Workshop on Bridging NLP and Public Opinion Research tomorrow #COLM2025

πŸ›ŽοΈ we have a great line up of keynotes, presentation, and panel discussion, followed by a happy hour

πŸ“ room 518B

schedule and info: sites.google.com/view/nlpor20...

09.10.2025 18:28 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I know the pro version of Claude will let me load up papers, that’s the next approach I’ll take

02.12.2024 12:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I tried similar prompts with the Assistant in SCite, but it gave errors and didn’t produce anything. I think it does better with shorter prompts (β€œfind references to support / disagree with this statement”)

(@scite.bsky.social exists, but I can't tag it)

02.12.2024 12:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

When I finally got it to make citations in the style I wanted, many of them were incorrect (which is wild, when there are only 40 or so papers loaded).

In the end, it didn’t save me any time at all

02.12.2024 12:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From the notebooklm community on Reddit Explore this post and more from the notebooklm community

It writes OK lit review text, but I can’t get it to make usable citations. It makes those little numbers I can hover over, but it’s a ton of manual work to turn those into \cite{xyz} commands.

A lot of complaints about similar issues online: www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm...

02.12.2024 12:56 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Looking for tips on how to use the new AI tools to help with a literature review.

I was so excited about NotebookLM, but my frustration is growing. I uploaded the papers (~40) I want it to draw from, and then spent several hours trying to get it to draft a reasonable lit review *with citations*

02.12.2024 12:56 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

@statstas.bsky.social β€” your point about totals rather than percents

07.11.2024 15:02 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s really funny, though not a comedy

07.05.2024 00:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Here’s a paper doing imputation. I read and earlier version, not the latest, and was frustrated that they didn’t compare their ML imputation method to other more traditional imputation approaches.

arxiv.org/pdf/2305.096...

19.04.2024 16:22 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

This is the closest I’ve found:

arxiv.org/abs/2401.08572

19.04.2024 16:20 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

How do you make a scientific case about a method’s usefulness without a proper lit review?

13.04.2024 13:53 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

by synthetic samples, I mean using LLMs to generate survey responses

"imagine you are a 54 year old African American man. Please answer the following survey question..."

12.04.2024 18:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Can anyone point me to a paper, WP, blog post that reviews the literature on synthetic samples? Thank you

12.04.2024 16:37 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Has anyone used DC’s school lottery as an instrument to evaluate effect of pre-k on subsequent educational achievement ?

01.04.2024 20:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

IMO, the worst problem with data analysis a in Excel is how hard it is to trace back where a result came from. Yes, there are now trace dependence and trace precedence buttons, but it still is not nearly as clear as it would be in a script file

30.03.2024 20:26 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Chapter 4 Errors of nonobservation: Sampling and coverage | Data Collection with Wearables, Apps, and Sensors Chapter 4 Errors of nonobservation: Sampling and coverage | Data Collection with Wearables, Apps, and Sensors

Took us a while, but we finally put another chapter of our book "Data Collection with #Wearables, #Apps, and #Sensors" online. Chapter 4: Errors of Nonobservation: #Sampling and #Coverage. bookdown.org/wasbook_feed... Let us know what you think! @stephnie.bsky.social

26.03.2024 08:58 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

They really are : β€œthe importance…in some vague sense” IIRC

24.03.2024 23:40 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I show students the definitions of the 4 types of weights, to try to prevent them from using aw= (because that’s what the command accepts) when they have pweights. I doubt I’m successful

24.03.2024 23:39 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

In case you missed it! "Interviewer Involvement in Respondent Selection Moderates the Relationship between Response Rates and Sample Bias in Cross-National Survey Projects in Europe" by Marta KoΕ‚czyΕ„ska, Piotr Jabkowski & Stephanie Eckman @stephnie.bsky.social doi.org/10.1093/jssa...

14.03.2024 16:02 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

@aapor.bsky.social @floriankeusch.bsky.social @daob.nl

28.02.2024 18:50 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Fantastic thread on data quality issues with inattentive respondents.We can’t weight our way out of these problems if the demographics are provide are wrong

23.02.2024 12:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Debatable β€” what do you mean by β€œvery well”?

10.02.2024 15:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Sort of β€” in R, PLmixed will give you similar results (discrimination, difficulty) to mirt. PLmixed fits β€œmixed models with factor structures”

01.02.2024 20:24 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

because they're economists πŸ˜‰?

29.01.2024 16:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
search results for "aapor.org conference"

search results for "aapor.org conference"

Searching for the dates of the next AAPOR conference, I typed in "aapor.org conference." None of the top hits were helpful --previous years, archived site

I think we could use a little Search Engine Optimization, @aapor.bsky.social

In the meantime -- include 2024 in your search (or "79th" πŸ™„πŸ€ͺ)

29.01.2024 16:15 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

New Article Alert! "Interviewer Involvement in Respondent Selection Moderates the Relationship between Response Rates and Sample Bias in Cross-National Survey Projects in Europe" by Marta KoΕ‚czyΕ„ska, Piotr Jabkowski & Stephanie Eckman @stephnie.bsky.social doi.org/10.1093/jssa...

26.01.2024 19:30 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes β€” some colleagues want to see an intercept slope version before they’ll trust the results

27.01.2024 11:00 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

well, right this minute I'm trying to show that IRT models are just multilevel logit models, which I'm told is true, but I cannot get the code to work

any help appreciated!

26.01.2024 16:29 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 0

Bluesky, LET'S DO THIS!

#stats #statistics

26.01.2024 14:03 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 6 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0

Ooo, that would be a good thread β€” statistical programming issues that have stolen hours of our lives

26.01.2024 13:45 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 2