He obliterated those back in June, rightπ€
He obliterated those back in June, rightπ€
www.maptap.gg March 7
99π― 97π₯ 99π― 100π― 96π₯
Final score: 982
Wordle 1,722 2/6
β¬β¬β¬β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Leicester avoided relegation the season before they won the league. Pearson got 7 wins in the last 9 and then got sacked over on-tour issues that summer. Ranieri took over then.
DOGSO happened when the foul happened. It doesn't matter where the foul happened. It's a free kick. Those become penalties when the foul happens in the penalty area. It seems quite logical to me.
That's stressful π
I'd play Kinsky in midfield right now. Best passer by a mile π
All 5 yard passes playing out under Ange, then yeetball under Frank.
πππ
Why would they, after 25 years, suddenly be bothered what the fans think? You just keep contradicting yourself.
I'm really bored with this now. Tata π
You are arguing against yourself. You say they want someone to deflect the blame and all the time he was there, that was Levy. So why did they get rid of such a perfect shield? As I said, you're making no sense at all.
We pay the 6th highest wages in the league. We overpay for average players and then pay them so much no one else will buy them from us. Those are operational decisions. Levy was in charge of those.
He can't be a scapegoat if he's no longer there. You're not making any sense.
So you can't answer because you are inventing things.
Relegation will be seriously bad news for quite a few content creators π
Audiences will shrink and so will some incomes.
Why did they get rid of Levy if he was doing such a good job implementing their instructions and being their scapegoat?
What were their instructions regarding the wage structure?
ENIC didn't tell Levy which players to buy. He spent enough to buy much better.
Jan transfer window is irrelevant in the scheme of things. You can't turn round the damage that's been done over years in one window, especially a Jan window when no one wants to sell.
"over-spending on transfer fees Spurs"
The value would have at least halve. They would comfortably invest 200m of their own to get that back. Plus the 300m they'd get for players who want to bail out.
I don't see ENIC selling their asset when its value is at its lowest. Quite the opposite. We'll be stuck with them until it recovers.
I took from the article that he blamed the situation on the fact that the medical department structurally was not up to the standard of other big clubs, not necessarily the competence of the individuals in it who are most likely overworked.
What they actually all said is that it was always the *same person's* fault that things didn't get done.
I'd argue that we haven't played like a relegation scrapper at all. We've played like meh all season. None of them committed to Franks tactics (if there even were any) but they need to commit to something from here on.
I'd much prefer it if the article didn't need to be written, but having made those terrible decisions, we are where we are. On the face of it, the article kind of makes sense in that a battler is exactly what we need right now. I hope we have enough of them tbh.
Right, but what about the article?
Appalling in what way? Elias suggests reasonably that Palhinha might be better suited to a team in the bottom half of the table and that's kind of where 16th is after all...
Wordle 1,714 5/6
β¬β¬π¨β¬β¬
β¬π©π¨β¬π©
π©π©β¬β¬π©
β¬π©β¬β¬β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
Sweated a bit too π