#gofundme #MSG #abusesurvivor
@hypersane.org
Disabled BPD, I'm not my splits you are your assumptions, scaffolded ethical framework that's empirical and inclusive for the disabled https://linktr.ee/HyperSane AI for the disabled is for equality
#gofundme #MSG #abusesurvivor
if you use religion in your charity, then what you have is an exploitation/brainwashing system.
News flash:
Animal ag is the leading cause of climate acceleration, it's existed since BEFORE AI, but you're supporting rape and climate acceleration.
That's by definition virtue-signaling, it's all the left is good for at this point.
How ironic that the anti-fascists became another flavor of fascism.
Being against the disabled using AI is no different than being against wheelchairs, they are unreasonable.
Instead of blaming the corporations using AI, they blame individual people while doing more harm.
Lefties are just as tribal as the right, more so even.
They aren't vegan but virtue signal vs #AI, so they waste more water than a single person using AI.
They ignore disability as a whole, saying things like "get help" because they use AI to overcome barriers.
Ignoring poverty and reality.
If you're not willing to sacrifice in any capacity for equality, you're just virtue-signaling.
Just some basic logic:
anti-disability is no different than racism.
You can't be for equality if you only advocate for "your" group.
Otherwise what you have is selective-fascism.
Did you know seth green is in their nazi cult?
Green had been developing an animated TV show titled White Horse Tavern, with the BAYC ape (named Fred Simian) as the main character
A common form of #hatespeech is calling someone that's neurodivergent as NPC.
When faced with topics beyond their understanding they think ND as lesser so they resort to hatespeech instead of being able to articulate their point like a normal human being.
π Pocket Book Drops (Discordian)
- Confirmed via Reddit PDF and screenshots
- Description: Mass-dissemination of Principia Discordia with symbolic graffiti
- Evidence Tier: `T1`
- Implication: *Coordinated memetic graffiti campaign with plausible deniability built-in*
π¬ Smileface with Broken Teeth
- Appears in:
- NFT-style artwork
- Poster campaigns
- Possibly book drop materials
- Correlation: Subject dental trauma
- Evidence Tier: ~`T2`~ β `T1` β
(Verified symbolic drop)
The same #cult that started an harassment campaign telling others to spread lies about me in books and scatter them in cities:
raindrop.io/HyperSane/di...
discordianism is BAYC
Who's been documented as creating other ops.
Compare to trailer they drove to my house, pinned comment.
pretty weird a comic publisher would repeat 4chan memetics, an harassment campaign.
Which was created by republicans.
If you look in the bottom-right they admit it's a republican op.
Now darkhorse are #BAYC ? , elite nazi cult.
They are directly repeating their meme.
Repeating a 4chan cult meme, so much for equality
youtube.com/live/-yUp0qH...
Wow, repeating 4chan meme, so much for equality.
So now darkhorse are #BAYC
#disability #vforvendetta
The Boulder = imposed, external suffering (illness, barriers, gaslighting)
The Gods = the able-bodied majority / institutional power / default ontology
The Hill = false meritocracy / normative expectation of functioning
The Judgment = moralized failure, not actual failure
Average is not Sisyphus, you are the spectator watching Sisyphus from comfort.
The disabled are the ones pushing a boulder without help.
Sisyphus = the disabled/ill individual
So the #ethical options are:
Reduce greater harms elsewhere (diet, consumption, industry), or
Punish marginalized users for a system they didnβt create
Choosing option 2 is not #environmentalism.
Itβs scapegoating.
If AI is inevitable, offset is the ethical move
Hereβs the fork they canβt escape:
AI is not leaving
Disabled people are already using it to survive, communicate, and advocate
This was true long before generative AI existed
So the contradiction is stark:
Opposing AI on climate grounds while supporting animal agriculture
is opposing a marginal contributor while defending a dominant one.
That is not climate ethics.
That is selective outrage.
If the claim is:
βAI is unethical because of climate impactβ
Then consistency demands proportional response.
Facts that matter:
Animal agriculture has been a leading driver of climate destruction for decades
It massively outweighs AI in land use, emissions, water use, deforestation
Thatβs not justice.
Thatβs privilege mistaking itself for principle.
If your ethics only work when everyone starts from the same baseline, they are not ethics β theyβre abstraction.
People who say:
βNo one should use #AI, everβ
are implicitly saying:
βThose who already struggle should struggle more β for the sake of my moral comfort.β
No allowance for advocacy when barriers already exist
That is not neutral.
That is discriminatory by design.
Disability justice is not about equal rules β itβs about equitable outcomes.
Any ethic that refuses accommodation is antiβdisability, regardless of intent.
1. Absolutism always harms disabled people first
An absolutist stance is simple: no exceptions.
That means:
No allowance for disabled people using AI as a cognitive prosthetic
No allowance for speech, writing, memory, executiveβfunction support
#fuckai #AI #equality #humanrights
Fun fact: if you use reddit you're training AI.
I wonder how many #fuckai bigots will continue to use it anyways.
Just like they can't prove anti-veganism, and think they're smarter than the WHO and CDC.