Sapphire

Then get the fuck off the public property. At this point, ICE should be considered shoot on sight.

If you're a Republican at this point, you support a pedophile and by extension an autocracy. There's no grey area here.

BREAKING: The usually snarky White House account has not responded to Iran’s attacks on social media! Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Oh yeah bud, I marched right up to the white house and demanded they bomb a country we have no business in. I have absolutely authority over the entire military, you didn't know that?

Math doesn't care what you think of it. Math doesn't need to prove itself to anything. Every aspect of existence is ruled by it; How we choose to interpret the symbols we made to express it is irrelevant to the core concept itself.

Far too many of you give a fuck what others think of your appearance.

Dude blocked me, what a surprise. Tried to post about using LLMs for programming logic where we actually know what we're doing then accuse us of being patronizing when you act superior but understand nothing.

Bruh no one cares about your personal feelings here. You're trying to defend using AI like it's written a thesis for you and that acceptable losses exist.

You know what happens when that LLM assisted code silently fails in an encryption test or backend security function? You lose.

I'm out.

And what if the boilerplate is wrong, how do you identify that? If you want a template generator, then make one.

condition fired off or why you have rounding errors or why the order of operations was incorrect or why that off by one issue manifests hundreds of calls down the stack.

Again, you're comparing a boolean *failure* to *complete* knowledge of the code, which invalidates using the LLM in the first pl

understand the *why*, so you can't debug the *what*.

Like I said earlier: If you understand the foundation, then you don't need an LLM, but if you don't understand the foundation and just trust that the LLM spat out working code that passes tests, you have no way of recognizing why that race

It's not a guardrail issue. You're acting like you can use an LLM as a master architect while ignoring that you don't understand how a nail works.

Your Holmes reference completely falls apart as well, because programming isn't a database of truths, it's a web of complimentary logic.

You don't

You're comparing an outright boolean failure to "working".

I can write a function that returns π by returning 22/7, but that doesn't mean it's actually π.

It's like passing a vector by reference in an accumulation function, sure, it "works", but it's also costing you 10x the memory footprint.

That's not the question.

To reiterate:

If *you* do not understand the code, how do *you* know where to look for the problem?

If you already understood it, why was an LLM needed?

If you "lose the skills" going from language to language, then you understood nothing and just pasted blocks.

Then answer the question. If you can't determine where the problem is to begin with because the AI wrote code for you that you didn't understand from the jump, like inline assembly in C, how are you possibly even going to ask the thing that generated it for you why it failed?

The issue is that a lot of AI generated code "works", but is outright incorrect about what they're doing, especially in long running context, or when dealing with lifetimes.

If *you* don't understand the underlying foundation, you're just piling trash on trash and calling it a better pile.

I know #femboys less concerned with their appearance than #Hegseth; Didn't they pay a ton of money for a personal government salon?

It's weird how the same people who go to child pageants are the same ones that protect a #pedophile

Added a check after uploading which also ensures the index is <= the array length as well just to prevent a null ref

The getter function. Real basic. Reading and setting the data isn't the difficult part, so these should be good for now.

Refactoring my entire rewind function for the third time, will now support interrupting the rewind, as well as more fine control over the velocities during the rewind.
Here's the setter part, real simple, with the null checks outside of the function.

#Unreal needs to fix #Fab sorting. If I sort by rating, I really don't give a shit about the 600 single review 5 star plugins, I want the 4.9 star 600 review plugin.

"Coward Nazi uses his friends to over-valuate own businesses"

FTFY.

They say like we don't have NSA dumps of nationstate class malware and tools from the Shadow Brokers and other sources.

This is actually pathetic.

I'm getting multiple #scam attempts a day now lol

Keep trying bruh, might want to find a softer target than a malware analyst.

"The very geography itself is now gated"

"More people survived but muh shareholders are unhappy about that"

The fuck is wrong with you lately

Is this a reporting issue or a genetic issue?

I feel like a lot of these "rankings" have to do with the availability of screenings.