Why should our service personnel risk their lives for a lunatic who has no plan? How many people will die for Trump, the draft dodger?
@labrador-lover1
Pro EU. Have 2 kids who went to Uni in EU & both work there. One on autistic spec. Love labradors. Libdem. And date a hard working Farmer. Itβs possible to love EU & a Farmer!! Power to women & girls. No DMs.
Why should our service personnel risk their lives for a lunatic who has no plan? How many people will die for Trump, the draft dodger?
Sending my condolences to Mr Woolas family. Take one day at a time. Itβs okay to feel sad.
My sister died of the same, aged 53. Cancer is so devastating.
Former Labour MP and minister Phil Woolas dies of brain cancer aged 66 www.lbc.co.uk/article/labo...
Jeez. Listening to folk gushing about Dubai. The treatment of lowered paid workers, is really poor. Passports are taken by sponsors. Maids are raped by their Emirati sponsors. And maids are imprisoned. Corruption is endemic. Itβs called baksheesh.
He wasnβt alive in the 50βs. Indeed I imagine many who harp back to the days when people caught polio & German Measles, & it could disable or kill them. Most werenβt alive. Iβm early sixties. I recall a baby with no eyes, whose mum had caught GM whilst pregnant at dadβs church.
Iβm continuing to listen to Vanessa Feltz on #LBC who has changed the focus to the amount of Brits who have returned from Dubai to the UK. I spent many years there. I always stayed in touch with my former house girl. She said there is trouble by the industrial zone near Abu Dhabi. Drones?
On #LBC listening to Vanessa. She is asking if Goodwin article in MoS speaks for them. His article appears to speak of a darling buds of may type memory.
Please ring in if you have time. I feel Goodwinβs article sounds like it is stirring up division & hate
Iβm looking up a Chocolate Brownie recipe. And an advert in the corner is for a Jacob Rees Mogg calendar. Who buys this stuff??
Stuart Holloway, a former manager in RBS/NatWest's notorious global restructuring group, has admitted to taking Β£600,000 in bribes in exchange for treating customersβ firms more leniently, following near-decade-long Police Scotland investigation.
Story by @jameshurley.bsky.social.
Thatβs a disgrace too.
But why is one expected to be acceptable & the other not?
Both are examples of Governments looking after their own & disgraceful behaviour.
An exceptional female Ambassador was removed to make way for a paedophiles friend.
Why was the original Ambassador removed?
We desperately need such a thing.
Starmer removed an impressive Female Ambassador from the US position in order to put a man who was not a professional in the diplomatic corps, & against advice, into the top role.
Knowing he had been friends with a paedophile known worldwide.
Starmer defends women/girls? F*ck off.
#Labour
Most Football Managers know something about Football, & most arenβt paid from the public purse.
Absolutely gobsmacked anyone is defending him.
Starmer removed a highly respected Female Ambassador to put a man without her skills in her place. Before we even consider that he was advised against doing it due to Epstein connection.
Shame he didnβt apply the same support for the female ambassador that was replaced by Mandelson
They removed the highly impressive Female ambassador to put a man who was mates with a paedo into the role
Thatβs why itβs even more dreadful that he ignored the vetting advice & insisted on putting a friend of Epstein in the most important Ambassadorial role in the World for the UK. They also removed the excellent Ambassador who was a Woman, to put a man without her skills into the role.
π€£
π
Useless sexist husbands?
Itβs too bizarre
Itβs tedious how Reform voters make excuses for the worst behaviour of their politicians & criticise Labour. And Labour do exactly the same in reverse.
Iβm not interested in excuses.
We are talking about Mandelson. And Starmer knew.
We should be protecting women & girls. But we donβt
I agree.
We had an excellent Ambassador in place in the US, whose career was the diplomatic service. They removed her & Starmer appears to have chosen to ignore the sage advice not to put Mandelson in the role due to his friendship with Epstein.
What did Mandelson have over Starmer?
Because Mandelson looked like an arrogant self serving pr*ck many years ago. Why was he fast tracked into this position when we had an excellent Ambassador already in place.
How is he not facing the prospect of prison? Selling secret information?
So much for Keir Starmer supporting women & girls.
He was determined to put a paedophiles friend into the top Ambassadorial role it seems.
How come a top barrister was βlied toβ. Where was the vetting? Why would a former barrister choose to ignore an obvious hornets nest, & sound advice?
When I watch reality tv, I always think itβs totally disfunctional, often misogynistic, few appear to work for a living.
But it feels like successive Governments are turning into reality TV.
Deceitful manipulator with paedophile friend, gets top job with Govtβ¦.
This should be considered insider trading with a prison sentence attached.
It feels like the private sector has higher standards than those in/ connected to, the public sector.
Whilst people like Paterson could lobby for hundreds of thousands, & keep the money, we have a problem
To save βAmericaβ they need to remove that lunatic
You have a point. How depressing that UK Govt knew Mandelson was still friends with Epstein. And UK Govt were content to still give him the the highest Ambassadorial role in the world.
The Secret Service would surely have advised the UK Govt on such a matter
Thanks for your input
He βsoldβ secret Govt information regards the 2008 crash to Epstein.
Surely this is equivalent of insider trading, & also breaks some kind of secrecy code.
Starmer said Mandelson lied yet doesnβt say how. Maybe they both are liars.
Mandelson emailed Tony Blairβs chief of staff to introduce his 'safe friend' Jeffrey Epstein www.lbc.co.uk/article/mand...