nah, their proofs are sterile. sure, they're outpacing us in quantity and meaningful progress driving [insert field] forward, but where's the soul? where is the subjective elegance only my proof has, and could possibly ever have? I'm not concerned, personally
it, with rare exceptions like this, is not faux! but I have plenty other bad traits first depicted by Aristotle, amongst others
(still great though; one of those rare truesight memes that pings precisely my top two mental referents for that name)
. o O ( imagining his brain uniformly dispersed throughout the entire giganose structure ) why have you revealed the horror of his anatomy to me?
makes me very happy to know you know what I mean (he is indeed)
seeing this on my feed apropos of nothing reminds me of the Marc Rebillet song Girl’s Club
tbabb post read you again award
nono they're right, I'm the problem. I keep doing this, I don't know why. I should know better
I clicked a chart this morning, and it happened again. at this point the fault is entirely with me for not learning. Nikita did nothing wrong club
tbh this is broadly characteristic of what a good For Me might look like now; I never expect full local content, at least the topics here are adjacent/rehashes of simcluster interactions, (ideally one might hope for papers/projects from further afield but who can ever know the counterfactuals etc)
not the ideal composition (eigenrobot is muted, and yet) but at least I recognise most of the names and the bangers are more innocuous than pure fakepolitik echoes so broadly a world away from what I had 30 likes prior
all I had to do was like ~20-40 posts, at least half of which I'd already liked previously but hadn't made a serious commitment to appreciating, thus revealing these to be the false likes, the likes of a promiscuous blasphemer unworthy of the righteous eye, and summarily purged from written record
and just like that, back to regular scheduled programming
doxxed
apologies in advance to any simcluster victims of the coming righteous likestorm in my vein attempt to resurrect some semblance of feed sanity
jfc I thought I was just kidding... I thought I had time... refresh of For You just now. I don't follow most/any of these accs. wow.
I crave the certainty of the swarm, Lois
I wish this were my feed
with them and this inevitably becomes overblown and misinterpreted as "clearly another fintwit connoisseur; serve him the rest of it. all of it, he yearns for the takes, monseigneur. deliver them unto him"
thought I learnt my lesson with cryptwit. but also, it's such an insane platform because there's no way to filter for intent. I actually do want breaking (not, BREAKING 🚨) news, but following accs I expect to deliver them is meaningless because I need to maintain an interaction freq
these are the rare posts where I can be almost certain of ensloppification even before reading it, which is neat, because the thing will have >15k likes and the niche simcluster bangers (correctly) served to me very rarely outpace ~10k oom containment line so, at least we get those few seconds back
I am actually getting a slew of these suddenly because.. I interacted with fintwit I guess? real ensloppified "nobody's talking about * but it's not just—" like this: x.com/BetterCallMe...
for a time, then I learnt to aggressively mute all such sources until my feed was pristine Certified Bangerhuel and there was no more need for tempering rage, I was delivered by the algo's good graces into the placid waters of lukewarm content.. anyway tldr it'll happen soon enough, give it time
my refractory period for disengaging from ragebait has been surprisingly short lately; presume that will change once I can no longer recognise which was made for me. give it time (specifically 2-3 months)
ominous tidings. of what, remains unclear
MMAcevedo in Nick Land's irreverent fever dream style with gacha ad clustering at every subsequent paywalled realisation tier of clarity. Make no mistakes
Manufacturing Content remains prophetic to this day. Noam Chazeer prognosticatory leagues above the rest, how does he do it
which is really to say anomaly detection outside of "obvious" image corruption (sufficient noise, metadata etc) is difficult in general (context from surrounding frames is key), so it's not always guaranteed temporally contiguous frames will result in good, let alone best, fit
eg truck blocks The View on frame X from 2025, which is otherwise perfectly visible in 2024. any contiguous scene stitcher would select the latter over the former. what should the user prefer? if we presume the latter (24), the stitcher should run first
yeah it seems most logical to hierarchially preference the same input stream else that's corrupted in which case find next-best candidate amongst pool of last X years. having said that, it's not Entirely clear that eg issues like occlusion can't force a switch (not Corruption per se but Bad Shots)
