Abel

who knows what goes on there

basically baitophilic maintenance vs personal growth distribution per poster that "leaks" alpha in every round and readjusts

I guess the accursed place because I never know whether not seeing [poster] there is a sign of the algo vs their absence. out of curiosity as a periodic temperature check: what % of your time would you say you're there vs here now?

I have a stash of these somewhere, but sometimes my stashes are harder to find than the originals, because I clearly do not respect my own time. please hold for an indefinite amount, your prompt is important to us

perhaps this would fit with new @pleometric.bsky.social ensloppification efforts.. but we'll likely never know

do you like Fatboy Slim, norvid? this tweet is about the song Weapon of Choice

diffusion reactions are a gol-type rule evolution (basically metabolic maintenance vs growth distribution per cell that "leaks" in every round and recalcs)

so eg if you want to blow up a patch of original image you need a function that maps that patch to a larger patch of the new img, so the evaluator keeps returning to that one bit as reference for a much larger patch on the new etc. you can find smooth fns that end up doing this in interesting ways

nice! not quite, this looks like grey-scott diffusion maybe? some diffusion reaction anyway; my visuals are a map into the complex plane along some fn typically, so tldr for every pixel in the new image you use some weird evaluator to determine what pixel from the old image should map there

it wasn't really a bit so much as an attempt at recollection that, when prompted for detail, resolved in failure to identify the other titles and realisation that one of these supposed recollections was not in fact a modern history title but a coincidentally homonymous nonfic (real favourite though)

I like it. not my the apotheosis of norvtweets for me either but each to their own hyperstimulus

let's double click on the top 3 pages here

one day we'll have the search engine depth to correctly evaluate this move; until then it remains firmly somewhere in the brilliancy blunder interpolation

little known fact about me: I have hyperbolindness, a condition that renders me unable to distinguish between hyperbole and just good 'ole. I don't have any reason to suspect this may be relevant here, simply sharing in the interest of enriching the simcommons

nah, cmon. one of the great european novels, says right there on the title

I forgot how needy it was, and continue to refuse out of principle. your mental appendages must remain unenvisioned by the quote of day

@miq.moe

we will rebuild godoglybot, we have the technology

please be wary of double clicking on errant dropdowns in future. thank you and have a pleasant stay

I had a feeling this might come up, and you'll be disappointed to know I can't recall the title of the third, while the second, though ordinally correct, is in fact The Sleepwalkers by Arthur Koestler, and is not so much a modern history classic as his second favourite book titled The Sleepwalkers

nice, thanks, onto the forever list they go. the sleepwalkers is an ancestral favourite (father’s top three favourite modern history pieces, I think?) and yet, even so…

My precedent? Dogbert v Reality, 2027, your honor. The landmark case of spiritual sovereignty applies mutatis mutandis to our present claims up to choice of ontological framing

Which did you enjoy most, if any?

nah, their proofs are sterile. sure, they're outpacing us in quantity and meaningful progress driving [insert field] forward, but where's the soul? where is the subjective elegance only my proof has, and could possibly ever have? I'm not concerned, personally

it, with rare exceptions like this, is not faux! but I have plenty other bad traits first depicted by Aristotle, amongst others

(still great though; one of those rare truesight memes that pings precisely my top two mental referents for that name)

. o O ( imagining his brain uniformly dispersed throughout the entire giganose structure ) why have you revealed the horror of his anatomy to me?

makes me very happy to know you know what I mean (he is indeed)

seeing this on my feed apropos of nothing reminds me of the Marc Rebillet song Girl’s Club

tbabb post read you again award