From last week: Student and work visa bans imposed on some countries to prevent asylum claims | Colin Yeo
From last week: Student and work visa bans imposed on some countries to prevent asylum claims | Colin Yeo
Latest post from us: Upper Tribunal politely declines to hear the majority of immigration judicial reviews in Scotland | Iain Halliday
In case you missed it: Failure to follow vulnerable witness guidance not always an error of law | Niamh Fegan
New from Free Movement: Upper Tribunal politely declines to hear the majority of immigration judicial reviews in Scotland | Iain Halliday
From last week: Section 3C after a refused fee waiver: the βreceiptβ test and why a second fee waiver wonβt save you | Nath Gbikpi
Latest post from us: Why the latest attempt to deter asylum seekers wonβt work | Wyon Stansfeld
New from Free Movement: Why the latest attempt to deter asylum seekers wonβt work | Wyon Stansfeld
From last week: Free Movement Weekly Immigration Newsletter #109 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
Latest post from us: Free Movement Weekly Immigration Newsletter #110 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
From last week: Habeas corpus writ not to be used to challenge bail conditions | Colin Yeo
New from Free Movement: Free Movement Weekly Immigration Newsletter #110 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
In case you missed it: Is it possible to apply to register as a British National (Overseas) for the first time after 1997? | Alex Piletska
From last week: Home Office loses Afghan deportation appeal in Court of Appeal | Colin Yeo
This matters enormously in practice. Representatives need to raise vulnerability issues early, flag specific adjustments needed, and build a clear record β both to protect clients during hearings and to preserve grounds for challenge if things go wrong.
The key question is whether the failure to follow the guidance actually made a material difference to the proceedings. Courts will look at whether the outcome could realistically have been different had the guidance been properly applied.
The guidance sets out steps tribunals should take to ensure fairness for appellants whose vulnerabilities affect their ability to participate in proceedings and give evidence. But not every departure from that guidance will be enough to overturn a decision on appeal.
We've published a new piece on when a tribunal's failure to follow the Joint Presidential Guidance Note on vulnerable witnesses does and doesn't amount to an error of law. It's a nuanced area with real practical significance for immigration and asylum appeals.
Here we are: my first episode hosting the podcast and very sadly @barryoleary.bsky.socialβs last!
In case you missed it: Immigration roundup podcast: February 2026 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
From last week: When would you ever use the secondary employment provisions? | James Lamont
Latest post from us: Failure to follow vulnerable witness guidance not always an error of law | Niamh Fegan
New from Free Movement: Failure to follow vulnerable witness guidance not always an error of law | Niamh Fegan
From last week: Home Secretary makes written statement on coming asylum changes | Colin Yeo
From last week: High Court considers challenge to British National (Overseas)Β passport refusal | Alex Piletska
Latest post from us: Is it possible to apply to register as a British National (Overseas) for the first time after 1997? | Alex Piletska
New from Free Movement: Is it possible to apply to register as a British National (Overseas) for the first time after 1997? | Alex Piletska
From last week: High Court gives guidance on Article 3 operational duty and Illegal Migration Act | Jamie Bell
Latest post from us: Immigration roundup podcast: February 2026 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
New from Free Movement: Immigration roundup podcast: February 2026 | Jasmine Quiller-Doust
He was then convicted of cannabis production and a proceeds of crime offence, receiving over three years' imprisonment. Deportation proceedings followed. He sought to rely on the s.117C exception requiring "lawful residence" for most of his life.