Trending

#CMIP5

Latest posts tagged with #CMIP5 on Bluesky

Latest Top
Trending

Posts tagged #CMIP5

Shows the occurrence of atmospheric (low humidity and high air temperatures) and soil drought conditions

"Drought directly limits terrestrial water availability and carbon uptake through low soil moisture (SM) and/or high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) 6,7 , and extreme water stress can substan- tially reduce agricultural production 8,9 and bring about wide- spread vegetation mortality 10,11 . Specifically, drought suppresses photosynthetic assimilation rates by reducing stomatal conduc- tance and related enzyme activity 6,12 and inducing leaf senes- cence and abscission as well 13 , resulting in reduced gross primary productivity (GPP) at the ecosystem scale. When water is limited, compound droughts (CDs) characterized by concurrent low SM and high VPD would cause even greater reductions in GPP than soil drought (low SM) or atmospheric aridity (high VPD) alone 14,15 . Low SM and high VPD tend to occur simultaneously over much of the global land surface, as SM deficits reduce evapotranspiration and increase sensible heat flux, resulting in a drier and warmer atmosphere and a higher VPD, and the high VPD in turn enhances evaporative water loss and accelerates reduction in SM16,17 . "

Here on models:

CDs are projected to become more frequent and more extreme, which could greatly reduce land carbon sink and compromise climate mitigation efforts 3,14 . However, assessments of past and future changes in CDs largely focus on extreme events from a statistical perspective 4,17,18 without taking into account whether these events cause adverse impacts on the environment. 

Risks of VCDs have been greatly underestimated as the widely adopted quantile-based approach identifies only 11% of VCDs and 26% of global GPP anomalies due to VCDs. The frequency and intensity of VCDs and their adverse impacts on carbon uptake are projected to increase further, irrespective of whether the CO2 fertilization effect on vegetation growth and photosynthesis is considered or not.

Shows the occurrence of atmospheric (low humidity and high air temperatures) and soil drought conditions "Drought directly limits terrestrial water availability and carbon uptake through low soil moisture (SM) and/or high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) 6,7 , and extreme water stress can substan- tially reduce agricultural production 8,9 and bring about wide- spread vegetation mortality 10,11 . Specifically, drought suppresses photosynthetic assimilation rates by reducing stomatal conduc- tance and related enzyme activity 6,12 and inducing leaf senes- cence and abscission as well 13 , resulting in reduced gross primary productivity (GPP) at the ecosystem scale. When water is limited, compound droughts (CDs) characterized by concurrent low SM and high VPD would cause even greater reductions in GPP than soil drought (low SM) or atmospheric aridity (high VPD) alone 14,15 . Low SM and high VPD tend to occur simultaneously over much of the global land surface, as SM deficits reduce evapotranspiration and increase sensible heat flux, resulting in a drier and warmer atmosphere and a higher VPD, and the high VPD in turn enhances evaporative water loss and accelerates reduction in SM16,17 . " Here on models: CDs are projected to become more frequent and more extreme, which could greatly reduce land carbon sink and compromise climate mitigation efforts 3,14 . However, assessments of past and future changes in CDs largely focus on extreme events from a statistical perspective 4,17,18 without taking into account whether these events cause adverse impacts on the environment. Risks of VCDs have been greatly underestimated as the widely adopted quantile-based approach identifies only 11% of VCDs and 26% of global GPP anomalies due to VCDs. The frequency and intensity of VCDs and their adverse impacts on carbon uptake are projected to increase further, irrespective of whether the CO2 fertilization effect on vegetation growth and photosynthesis is considered or not.

Next massive model error gets confirmed: Serious underestimation of reduced carbon uptake due to vegetation compound droughts

The error will develop a non-linear nature as the underlying processes not included in models behave non-linear...

#CMIP6 #CMIP5 #climate #extremeevents #uöäü1sinks

3 1 1 0
Preview
On the Effect of Historical SST Patterns on Radiative Feedback Post 1980 the Earth warmed with feedbacks uncorrelated with—and indicating much lower equilibrium climate sensitivity than—that expected for long-term CO2 increase Satellite observations of chang...

When I read something like that i'm just dumbfounded!

λ the climate feedback parameter

"Until recently it was often assumed that λ was—to a good approximation—a constant property of the climate system"

#Climate #CMIP5 #CMIP6 #Earth

0 0 1 0
Showing the principal difference of how the real world oceans distribute energy and how models are doing it.

In the real world oceans are taking in heat and they are releasing it with the overall net effect of storing heat. Models just use the net effect of storing energy. 

The same with heat exchange between the mixed layer and deeper layers. In the real world heat is mixed below the mixed layer but also resurfaces with the net effect of heat being transported to greater depths. In the models just heat goes from the mixed layer to deeper layers.

As long as the net ratios do not change all is nice and well, but if the ratios change, climate models would become trash.

And this could now be starting - ocean heat uptake could be weakening with the net of effect of the ratio of the oceans share of heat accumulation falling and the ratio of heat in the atmosphere and for land warming & ice melting increasing with the net result of surface warming speeding up - how much we have no clue as there exist no papers exploding this possibility which is now being started to be discussed...

"Critical Southern Ocean climate model biases traced to atmospheric model cloud errors"; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05634-2.pdf

Showing the principal difference of how the real world oceans distribute energy and how models are doing it. In the real world oceans are taking in heat and they are releasing it with the overall net effect of storing heat. Models just use the net effect of storing energy. The same with heat exchange between the mixed layer and deeper layers. In the real world heat is mixed below the mixed layer but also resurfaces with the net effect of heat being transported to greater depths. In the models just heat goes from the mixed layer to deeper layers. As long as the net ratios do not change all is nice and well, but if the ratios change, climate models would become trash. And this could now be starting - ocean heat uptake could be weakening with the net of effect of the ratio of the oceans share of heat accumulation falling and the ratio of heat in the atmosphere and for land warming & ice melting increasing with the net result of surface warming speeding up - how much we have no clue as there exist no papers exploding this possibility which is now being started to be discussed... "Critical Southern Ocean climate model biases traced to atmospheric model cloud errors"; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05634-2.pdf

Love this one showing real world principles and how models are doing it

The result of the simplification of important processes is sadly that we are now seriously underestimating the warming we will get...

#climate #CMIP6 #CMIP5

2 2 0 0
Preview
Muted Amazon Rainfall Response to Deforestation in a Global Storm‐Resolving Model This study is the first to explore the response of Amazon precipitation to complete deforestation using a global storm-resolving model Despite a strong decrease in evapotranspiration, mean Amazon...

You let your model calculate 3 years and get a trash result

What do you do in our system?

a: analyze what caused the error

b: publish it and discuss why the result may not fit

c: just publish your result as the message makes a nice headline

Best option for your career is C...

#climate #CMIP5

2 1 4 0
A graph showing relative humidity declines over the continents developing a robust negative trend since the 2000s. In 2024 till January 2025 we had again highly negative values near record levels. 

The drying of continents supports exceptional high temperatures, flash droughts, higher rates of wind and water erosion (floods hitting parched out landscapes), or that dryness is the main metric for large wildfires to become possible.

In other words models underestimating the drying trend of the continents do not see the collapse of the terrestrial carbon sink coming that involves lots of other knock on effects.

https://climate.copernicus.eu/january-2025-warmest-january-and-lowest-arctic-sea-ice-extent-month?utm_source=socialmedia&utm_medium=bs&utm_campaign=january-2025-warmest-january-and-lowest-arctic-sea-ice-extent-month

A graph showing relative humidity declines over the continents developing a robust negative trend since the 2000s. In 2024 till January 2025 we had again highly negative values near record levels. The drying of continents supports exceptional high temperatures, flash droughts, higher rates of wind and water erosion (floods hitting parched out landscapes), or that dryness is the main metric for large wildfires to become possible. In other words models underestimating the drying trend of the continents do not see the collapse of the terrestrial carbon sink coming that involves lots of other knock on effects. https://climate.copernicus.eu/january-2025-warmest-january-and-lowest-arctic-sea-ice-extent-month?utm_source=socialmedia&utm_medium=bs&utm_campaign=january-2025-warmest-january-and-lowest-arctic-sea-ice-extent-month

Just for the record: this model error is massive!

Here graph showing the latest data on relative humidity over land showing that accelerating surface warming of the oceans comes with massive knock on effects...

#CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CMIP7 #IPCC #climate

0 0 0 0
Preview
Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change - Nature Reviews Microbiology The microbial majority with which we share Earth often goes unnoticed despite underlying major biogeochemical cycles and food webs, thereby taking a key role in climate change. This Consensus Statemen...

The warning had been issued in 2019: "Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change"; www.nature.com/articles/s41...

#climate #Earth #CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CMIP7

its just a black box that can turn into the box of Pandora...!

1 0 1 0

"This is urgently required for updating impact assessments of extreme weather on ecosystems and climate services, but also for ensuring that climate and Earth system models are fit for purpose in predicting the magnitude and frequency of extremes."Computational power the problem #CMIP5 #CIMP6 #CMIP7

0 0 0 0
Preview
Resolving Weather Fronts Increases the Large‐Scale Circulation Response to Gulf Stream SST Anomalies in Variable‐Resolution CESM2 Simulations There is a large circulation response to idealized Gulf Stream sea-surface temperature (SST) anomalies in an atmospheric model with 14-km regional grid refinement This response is weaker or absen...

Next major flaw of climate models slowly reveals itself: small scale driven circulation

You need e.g. to simulate the intensification of convection to simulate the circulation response to warming as vertical movements drive horizontal air mass movements

#climate #uöäü1models #CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CIMP6

4 1 2 0

What I wonder here is by which mechanisms can the SOx-cloud forcing be delayed by 3.5 years after cloud reductions from the IMO regulation occurred. Especially, the regional cloud effects happen in the first few months as SOx is fast removed from the lower troposphere. #CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CMIP7

0 0 0 0
Preview
Modeling 2020 regulatory changes in international shipping emissions helps explain anomalous 2023 warming Abstract. The summer of 2023 saw an anomalous increase in temperatures even when considering the ongoing greenhouse-gas-driven warming trend. Here we demonstrate that regulatory changes to sulfate emi...

This result is strange as it is way too specific:

"whereas the NOSHIP ensemble demonstrates a striking agreement with observations in the manifestation of an anomaly compared to past years starting in June 2023, i.e., 3 years after the change in shipping emission"

#CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CIMP7 #climate

1 0 1 0

Its a model result from the paleoclimate Modeling
Intercomparison Project phase ( #PMIP4)

This does not fit with reality or?

#CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CMIP7

"The state of the AMOC revealed from the Subpolar North Atlantic Sea Surface Salinity"

0 0 1 0
Preview
Connecting the SST Pattern Problem and the Hot Model Problem We reconcile seemingly contradicting evidences for the ability of climate models to reproduce observed surface temperature pattern trends All models fail to reproduce long-term trends but many al...

Just for the record:

"Our findings suggest that two not well understood problems of the current generation of climate models are connected and we highlight the need to increase understanding of decadal-scale variability."

#CMIP5 #CMIP6 #CMIP7 #climate #uöäü1models #IPCC

5 1 1 1
Post image

A novel methodology using new high res #climate projections, #CMIP5 projections and local observed data highlights increasing risk of heat stress (heatwave frequency and consecutive dry days) for #Malawi #tea growing regions @nehamitts #UMFULA @FCFAhycristal @future_climate

0 0 0 0