Quinn Que
@Edokwin
·
1h
I'm not trying to be more obnoxious than necessary, but bad arguments, weird digressions, and goalpost moving deserve pushback.
The Bottomline is this: Philosophy is thinking about the world. (Hard) scientific work is an outgrowth of that. To say otherwise would be illogical.
Opie
@PalaeoPhilo
·
56m
After mentioning Bacon i then offered an idea of science having a natural history much older humans or ancient society. That evolved through organisms that developed successful models of the world with greater fitness.
Opie
@PalaeoPhilo
·
54m
Naturalism and pragmatism are schools of thought that reject the ordered relationship between science and philosophy you’ve stated
Quinn Que
@Edokwin
·
51m
I'm not sure you're representing those terms accurately with this summary. Leave it aside.
You have a hypothesis. Fine. Why couldn't philosophy have occurred with Denisovans, given the crude definition of "science" you're wielding?
🕷️~ Brood Mother Chesh ~🕷️
@GoblinQChesh
·
36m
Which school of logic are you using to call this "illogical" ?
Quinn Que
@Edokwin
·
28m
How is this relevant?
(Probably a mix of formal and informal tbh.)
🕷️~ Brood Mother Chesh ~🕷️
@GoblinQChesh
·
16m
could you elaborate?
Quinn Que
@Edokwin
Could you not ask me to go on a side quest or tangent?
Short of some garden path argument to imply an ad hom or supposedly disqualifying thing about me personally, I see no point in this. It's a complete non sequitur and has no value vis a vis the OP. Have a good day. 👋🏿
🕷️~ Brood Mother Chesh ~🕷️
@GoblinQChesh
·
7m
I dont see how it is a side question to ask what logic someone is using when they are arguing/concluding that someones point is "illogical" This also seems REALLY fking defensive. But whatever dude, have a good day lol
I literally run a philosophy show. Why is everyone always so scared of me all the time?!
@palaeophilo.bsky.social @solo1y.bsky.social @trolleydave.bsky.social
#debatehub @debatehub.bsky.social