While re-reading a Victorian novel that had been dismissed by critics as “sentimental,” she realized it was being critiqued using very different criteria than that of other books, particularly those enshrined in the English canon of literature. She said women’s writing was like a quilt being judged by the standards of wood-working. Beautiful work was being ignored because it was stitched, not carved.
Then Showalter saw how different generations of women wrote about the topics that were used by society to constrain women. The writing about issues like marriage, hysteria, ambition, silence, and others changed as society reacted to the push for women’s rights. Those changes were one indicator that women’s writing was quite different from that of men’s. And Showalter kept seeing more indicators.
Those indicators clarified the need for a new and distinct form of literary analysis for women’s writing. Showalter called it gynocriticism, and said it offered new perspectives on the ways in which women create meaning through their writing.
Some academics said gynocriticism made it possible for literary criticism to be generous. It could also tell stories instead of just issuing a verdict.
An undated photo of author, critic, and feminist Elaine Showalter.
Source: Women's Media Center
It is the birthday in 1941 of the American author, literary critic, and feminist Elaine Showalter.
She realized women's writing needed a new type of literary criticism, so she created one.
#WriterSky #BookSky #LiteraryAnalysis #Theory #BOTD