you’d think…
but now #MenGoingTheirOwnWay just wail about the purported #MaleLonelinessEpudemic they created for just being too much of an asshole
0
0
0
0
#MenGoingTheirOwnWay
Latest posts tagged with #MenGoingTheirOwnWay on Bluesky
Trending
#Illinois Primaries
#The Archers
#European Politics
#Trump's NATO Stance
#US-Iran Relations
#ICE Custody
#Joe Kent
#St. Patrick's Day
#World Baseball Classic
#Rachel Maddow
#Illinois Primaries
#The Archers
#European Politics
#Trump's NATO Stance
#US-Iran Relations
#ICE Custody
#Joe Kent
#St. Patrick's Day
#World Baseball Classic
#Rachel Maddow
Posts tagged #MenGoingTheirOwnWay
aaaaw
#MenGoingTheirOwnWay discovered there were only just so many #PickMe girls on the loose…
& #Women discovered we saved 7 hours of *their housework* a week…
0
0
0
0
what all those jackoff #MenGoingTheirOwnWay got what?
Lonely?
gosh
well, we figured out that we saved 7-hours a week in housework, & cleaning cat litter was easier
0
0
0
0
Give how much I’ve been watching #Women blowing off the idea that “Poor #LonelyMen have been #Perpetually #Victimized by #FemiNazis” (as in the #MenGoingTheirOwnWay broke their #FleshLights -are they made in #China?)
I just wanna leave this right here regarding #FragileMasculinity
0
0
0
0
Realize that the #MaleLonelinessEpidemic is just a #FAFO situation from listening to #JoeRogaine, #BitsyPeterson & #TaintTate popularizing #MaleVictimhood as an entire #Personality
#MenGoingTheirOwnWay is pitiful #self-own
that #blames | #externalizes #Women for their #MommyIssues & #selfLoathing
0
0
0
0
While the General Social Survey graph from 2018 is made viral again and again on social media, the same survey on more recent years is completely ignored. Reality is that in both 2021 and 2022, the sexless in those years where below the 20%, which is consistent with former years. Most men and women were having sex. In 2021, women even reported being slightly more sexless than men. The survey also included a variable to measure people who were sexless for the last 5 years. Less than 10% of men and women reported being sexless.
It is also repeated constantly that there are more single men than women, and it is suggested that it is because women are part of soft harems with High Value Males. This idea has been repeated so many times that even researchers have adopted it. But the truth is that this disparity has been a thing for decades, even a century.
Before the sexual revolution, when everyone was married (right?) there was also a disparity between single men and single women. The key here is that the disparity exists between young people, and the most near explanation is age gap relationships. But also, nowadays people report less interest in having a relationship. It’s curious how the "women and men are different" crowd swear that single women are looking for casual dates with "high value males" when it has been proven over and over than men have a higher sexual drive. Dating apps don't seem to aggravate any human mating tendency, hook up culture has remained the same since the 80's.
Graph showing no increase in promiscuity among young adults
Understanding the #manosphere aka umbrella for communities like #incels , #MGTOW #mengoingtheirownway (except they don’t), #MRA , #redpill , #blackpill
(4/6: the truth between the disparity of single men and single women)
credit: lebensmudewing
1
0
0
0
“The Lie” The manosphere term is not the one that social scientists use. It is whimsical and doesn't have sense...on the surface. The magic is on repeating that women are hypergamous, that they will choose all the time only a few men and let the rest sexless, single or childless, that sexual revolution and women's freedom of choice is a disaster and contrary to civilization. If the lie is repeated enough times, people will start to believe it. And well, it worked. It worked so well that feminists, instead of checking the data, see the male strategy and debunk the nonsense, decided to repeat the same lie. Women are choosing better, women are making men single and sexless! Pussy Power! There is literally a book on this. White supremacists also adopted the term, and the manosphere also adopted white supremacists perspective; they quote the work of Roger Devlin, Sexual Utopia in Power from time to time. Normal people also believe in it. They say that there is a male sexlessness crisis, singleness crisis, marriage crisis, birthrate crisis. And women are the problem, they should lower their crazy standards, they should stop being delusional.
Caption “Women are rating 80% of men below average! They are delusional! Their simps make them believe they are 10/10!”
It's extremely easy to fall in the rabbit hole. They start hearing about a disbalance on the distribution of sex, or dating, or in dating apps matches. They start hearing about a singleness crisis among men, and they have already accepted that such disbalance, such crisis is a modern thing, because no one seemed to talk about it in the past. (right?) They hear about male loneliness and mental health issues, and they understand that the disbalance is a bad thing. So they are one step away from start believing that mating is a process that should be regulated and controlled by the state, religion or cultural norms. Like, one click away from watching Jordan Peterson saying exactly that. The manosphere have been repeating this idea for more than 10 years. At least one decade feminists had to stop this shitshow and they didn't, which is surprising given that the whole thing is perfectly summarized in the white supremacist essay I linked above. The ones who spread and believe in this idea don't care about the data, they want the narrative, and it can be used to promote diverse agendas. So, instead of debunking and calling out, they prefered to use the narrative for the teminist cause and they are now losing. Women are losing. Women lost.
Understanding the #manosphere aka umbrella for communities like #incels , #MGTOW #mengoingtheirownway (except they don’t), #MRA , #redpill , #blackpill
(3/6: #themalelonelinessepidemic)
credit: lebensmudewing
1
0
1
0
Once you become familiar with all these communities, you start to see how they are all the same. They share the same stats, the same studies, the same terms, the same narratives. The only thing that changes is the label, if the members can or not to have sex with women, if the members want or not to have sex with women, and if the members "care" or not about society. One of the core terms that is transversal to almost all communities is "Hypergamy". (The central one on MRA is Gynocentrism). And is a tricky one. Men on these communities are used to gaslight and belittle external people, but also they bully each other constantly. In spanish, for example, MGTOW ones used to dedicate each other long livestreams and called each other cucks, betas, manginas, etc. One point of discussion and "artistry" on the manosphere is hypergamy. It has inspired long videos, livestreams, books, blogspots and debate among its members. Entire communities have been divided over this concept, and others have been created.
In their videos and "private" spaces they call any woman hypergamous. MacKenzie Scott divorced Jeff Bezos, and she was called hypergamous by these people, arguing that she planned it all and ignoring that she divorced because Jeff cheated on her. Women who date men who are more attractive than them are hypergamous, women who date men who are less atractive than them but have money are hypergamous, women who date men with less education than them are hypergamous. Women who rate men "below average" (another male bullshit story) are hypergamous. Women's nature is hypergamous and male nature is not, even if men also leave their geriatric wives for 20 year old women, even if men also cheat with a more attractive mistress, even if men marry more educated women, even if men marry women with more money. They are not hypergamous, they are polygamous, but also don't mind to settle with a woman given that "women choose" and men barely have any chance with women. Are you getting it, right? Anything a woman do is hypergamy. Except when you call them out and tell them it's all fake. Then, they come with studies on hypergamy. "How can you say that women are not hypergamous if this study say that they 'marry up'?". Suddenly the term only applies to marriage.
Here's the deal. Hypergamy is a term used by social scientists that is related to marriage and the act of marrying up in social class, annual income or status. Since superior education in the west is a high sign of status (repeated two times in a list of status signals among men and women across 14 countries), studies on the subject account for income and degrees. The research found that women are married to men who earn more than them, but don't have more education than them, so men are "marrying up" in status. Such trend has no substantially changed among decades. Nevertheless, it is recognized that it doesn't translate on men being the breadwinners, given that most marriages are dual income. But it's enough to them, even when the second they provide those studies they make it clear they are being dishonest. The seeds have been planted; women are choosing only the rich ones to marry, leaving poorer men single. The one who is debating them and the ones watching the exchange, only have to start to believe that female hypergamy is rising, being amplified by technology and being extended to other aspects of relationships.
Understanding the #manosphere aka umbrella for communities like #incels , #MGTOW #mengoingtheirownway (except they don’t), #MRA , #redpill , #blackpill
(2/6: #Hypergamy as a concept )
credit: lebensmudewing
0
0
1
0