Trending

#ScienceNotSpin

Latest posts tagged with #ScienceNotSpin on Bluesky

Latest Top
Trending

Posts tagged #ScienceNotSpin

Preview
Whopper of the Week: RFK Jr’s Bogus Attacks on Mifepristone Threaten Abortion Access | Defend Public Health Secretary Kennedy has repeatedly challenged the safety of mifepristone, one of two drugs used in most abortions. Hundreds of studies using decades of data have conclusively shown that mifepristone is ...

🤥 #WhopperOfTheWeek: attacking a medicine with 25+ years of safety data to restrict abortion access.

Mifepristone is safe and widely used; lies have no place in healthcare.  #ScienceNotSpin #ReproRights #DefendPublicHealth

Contributor 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

www.defendpublichealth.org/opinion/whop...

1 0 0 1
Post image

📊 FACT CHECKED: 43 studies, rigorous sibling analyses, & REAL science: New research published in The Lancet Ob shows Tylenol taken in pregnancy doesn’t raise the risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disabilities — debunking past political #ScienceNotSpin
#BlueSky #MedSy #ObSky #PedsSky #EMSky

11 1 1 1
Preview
Vaccines, Autism, and a CDC That Blinked This essay examines how recent political intervention has reshaped the CDC’s public messaging on vaccines and autism. In Part 1, I explain why the scientific evidence on this topic has not changed—and...

The science on vaccines and autism hasn’t changed. The CDC’s messaging has. Part 1 of my new series for @ACSHorg: www.acsh.org/news/2025/12...

#vaccines #autism #CDC #ScienceNotSpin

0 0 0 0
Preview
Trump Goes Full Anti-Vaxxer, Announces Link Between Tylenol Use And Autism Despite Lack Of Evidence Experts say the rhetoric appears to ignore and undermine decades of science into the genetic and environmental factors that can play a role in the disorder.

Who wants to water down some science for the president?

#ScienceTruth #DontWaterDownTheFacts #ProtectScience #EvidenceMatters #SayNoToPseudoscience #ScienceNotSpin #IntegrityInResearch #ScienceForAll #TruthOverHype #ScienceSpeaks #Trump #DonaldTrump

www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-...

0 0 1 0
Light green patterned background with image of a wildfire at bottom of image. Text reads “A NEW DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STUDY THAT DOWNPLAYS THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ....Isn't Scientifically Credible” Arrow icon pointing right with text above reads “SWIPE FOR MORE”. Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green patterned background with image of a wildfire at bottom of image. Text reads “A NEW DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY STUDY THAT DOWNPLAYS THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ....Isn't Scientifically Credible” Arrow icon pointing right with text above reads “SWIPE FOR MORE”. Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “MORE THAN 85 CLIMATE

EXPERTS HAVE RELEASED A REVIEW OF THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE'S NEW CLIMATE REPORT, FINDING IT BIASED, FULL OF ERRORS, AND NOT FIT TO INFORM POLICYMAKING.” Arrow icon pointing right with text above reads “A FEW REASONS WHY”. Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “MORE THAN 85 CLIMATE EXPERTS HAVE RELEASED A REVIEW OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE'S NEW CLIMATE REPORT, FINDING IT BIASED, FULL OF ERRORS, AND NOT FIT TO INFORM POLICYMAKING.” Arrow icon pointing right with text above reads “A FEW REASONS WHY”. Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “1. TINY TEAM OF HAND-PICKED CONTRARIANS.

Major assessments typically take years and involve a wide range of subject-matter experts. DOE employed a team of just five authors, all well known for manufacturing uncertainty. With the authors often writing outside their areas of expertise, the committee produced a report containing basic errors.” Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “1. TINY TEAM OF HAND-PICKED CONTRARIANS. Major assessments typically take years and involve a wide range of subject-matter experts. DOE employed a team of just five authors, all well known for manufacturing uncertainty. With the authors often writing outside their areas of expertise, the committee produced a report containing basic errors.” Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “2. NO PEER REVIEW OR TRANSPARENCY. Unlike legitimate assessments, the report was drafted in secret, with no independent peer review and no accountability for responding to public comments.” Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

Light green background. Text reads “2. NO PEER REVIEW OR TRANSPARENCY. Unlike legitimate assessments, the report was drafted in secret, with no independent peer review and no accountability for responding to public comments.” Text at bottom right corner of image reads “DOE Study Review August 2025”

ICYMI: The Trump regime’s DOE’s draft report isn’t science - it’s spin.

It cherry-picks evidence, ignores consensus, and was written in secret by a hand-picked few.

Last week, independent experts called it out.

#ScienceNotSpin #RealScience

1 2 1 0

3/ Critics warn this could legitimize debunked claims about vaccine dangers & erode trust. Supporters say it’s about “rigorous science.” The question: oversight or optics? #ScienceNotSpin

2 0 0 0

This isn’t just gut flora drama—it’s organ damage, neurotoxicity, and possible links to Parkinson’s.
But EPA? Nah, fuck nuance—they’re just chugging from industry’s Kool-Aid.
#ProfitOverPeople #ScienceNotSpin 🧠🔬

1 1 1 0