Latest posts tagged with #Title10 on Bluesky
The #SCOTUS indicated that it WOULDN'T RULE on Trump's attempt to send the #NationalGuard to #Chicago after Trump sought information whether "regular forces" means military. So, Trump might be stripped ENTIRELY of his power to deploy the military into cities under #Title10!
youtu.be/5A13FjIpxK0?...
Trump’s Pentagon ordered National Guard to create “quick reaction forces” for “public order” policing, making riot control a domestic mission under executive command. #Trump #CivilMilitary #PublicOrder #Authoritarianism #Project2025 #Pentagon #USMilitary #NationalGuard #Title10 #Title32 #TheGuardian
Trump’s apparent plan to invoke the Insurrection Act. A video by Robert Reich. 🚨🚨🚨‼️‼️‼️
#NoInsurrectionAct #DefendDemocracy #NoPlenaryAuthority #Title10 #NoMartialLaw
@rbreich.bsky.social
youtu.be/31X8vrfgHqs
Oregon Governor Tina Kotek’s demobilization order, backed by a federal court injunction, turned a contested activation into an operational standstill, reaffirming constitutional checks on executive use of the Guard. #Oregon #NationalGuard #CivilMilitary #Title10 #Kotek #USNORTHCOM #9thCircuit #OPB
I just had a great call with @vanhollen.senate.gov and @alsobrooks.senate.gov. I specifically brought up my background in #NationalSecurity and #tRump repeated violations of #PosseComitatus. I am pleased they’re introducing amendments to #NDAA to protect us from OUR OWN #Military! #Title10 #Title32
In addition to not being a blank check for PotUS, it's definitely not there so one governor can decide to use their state's #NationalGuard to violate another state's sovereignty. Abbott can go fk himself with his attempt at abusing #Title10 & #Title32.
If you don't know the difference between Title 32 and Title 10 status for the National Guard, this video will help immensely. The difference is key with Trump's strategy to control his agenda in blue states. Our court system will prove vital in the coming weeks and months ahead.
#Title32
#Title10
…A 19th-century #law, the #PosseComitatusAct, generally prohibits the use of the US #military for domestic civilian law enforcement, absent an #insurrection. But #Trump did not invoke the #InsurrectionAct. Rather, he argued that an overarching federal law, #Title10 of the US Code, which lays out […]
Watch these tells:
• Great Lakes access approved
• Guard units switched to Title 10
• “Obstruction” language from DHS/DoD
• Perimeter/security missions that look like logistics—then uniforms on corners. 10/
#FollowThisClosely
#DHS
#AbolishICE
#Title10
#DOD
Flip the Guard: Governors can say “no,” but the White House can federalize state Guard under Title 10 citing “obstruction.”
That moves units from the governor to federal command—ready to “assist” DHS on city streets. 4/
#Title10
#Chicago
#DHS
#Trump deployed both the #NationalGuard members & a battalion of #Marines in #California in June while citing “incidents of violence & disorder” that had occurred during #ICE operations to round up undocumented immigrants. Under the law Trump used, #Title10, the #troops are generally prevented […]
A state’s #governor generally oversees his own #NationalGuard, but the president can #federalize & deploy #troops over objections under #Title10 of federal #law. It permits the president to issue orders to National Guard members if there is a “rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the […]
Trump names Chicago, New York, Baltimore, Oakland, and Los Angeles as possible federal troop deployment sites, signaling an escalation in domestic military posturing and psychological pressure on city leaders. #Trump #NationalGuard #TIME #Title10 #PosseComitatus
Trump’s use of 10 U.S.C. § 12406 to federalize the Guard in Los Angeles, California, protests sets a precedent for legally framed domestic deployments in politically charged contexts; future targets may include other named cities. #Trump #Title10 #NationalGuard #PosseComitatus #Reuters
Donald Trump just crossed a major red line! And it should alarm every #American. #NationalGuard #Marines #Title10 #PosseCommitatusAct
youtu.be/A-cPhQ90gB8?...
That request centers on a 19th-century #law, the #PosseComitatusAct, that generally makes it illegal to use the #military for #domestic law enforcement. The #Trump admin has argued that the #troops are not themselves performing law enforcement tasks, but rather are protecting civilian agents who […]
Judge Breyer’s temporary restraining order #TRO] concerned only the #NationalGuard & whether it was lawful for #Trump to mobilize them under #federal control. At the hearing on Friday, he is also set to address a #state request to limit #troops under federal control to guarding federal buildings […]
Either way, litigation in the case is set to return on Friday to the San Francisco courtroom of the Federal District Court judge, Charles Breyer, for a hearing. He is weighing whether to issue a more durable preliminary injunction restricting what #Trump can do with some 4,000 #NationalGuard […]
The ruling means control of the #California #NationalGuard will stay in #federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.
The #state could choose to ask the full appeals court to rehear the matter, or it could directly ask #SCOTUS to intervene. But the state might also just move on from the […]
The court case could have wider implications on the president’s #power to deploy #soldiers within the #US after #Trump directed #immigration officials to prioritize #deportations from other #Democratic-run #cities.
Trump, a Republican, argued that the #troops were necessary to restore order […]
![Similarly, Plaintiffs' argument that the text requires, "[a]t a minimum," that the Governor be "consulted about an order" is not supported by the language of § 12406. Rather, the decision to activate the National Guard under § 12406 is textually committed to the President alone. See 10 U.S.C. § 12406 (*[T]he President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard ...." (emphasis added)). Even with the requirement that such orders be issued "through the governor," id., that provision does not grant the governor any "consulting" role. It simply delineates the procedural mechanisms through which the President's orders are issued.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z5dcgwxgfgqj72dyuzkp6nu2/bafkreiebw4prjm6r6p3474wucr7w7ofdqq64bvrddgebuv733vbi2r7dly)
Similarly, Plaintiffs' argument that the text requires, "[a]t a minimum," that the Governor be "consulted about an order" is not supported by the language of § 12406. Rather, the decision to activate the National Guard under § 12406 is textually committed to the President alone. See 10 U.S.C. § 12406 (*[T]he President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard ...." (emphasis added)). Even with the requirement that such orders be issued "through the governor," id., that provision does not grant the governor any "consulting" role. It simply delineates the procedural mechanisms through which the President's orders are issued.
The court used 14 of its 38 page ruling rejecting the #DOJ's argument that #Trump's decision to federalize the #California #NationalGuard can't be reviewed by the courts.
But, the court concluded that the requirement in #Title10 §12406 that "orders ... shall be […]
[Original post on masto.ai]
A 3-judge panel of the San Francisco-based #9thCircuit Court of Appeals extended a pause it placed on US District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that #Trump had called the #NationalGuard into #federal service unlawfully […]
🤬🤬🤬
US court lets #Trump retain control of #California #NationalGuard for now
A US appeals court let Trump late Thurs retain control over CA's National Guard while the state's #Democratic #governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the #Republican president's use of the […]
And the remaining 2 were in response to #protests: one to #protect a famous 1965 march of #CivilRights activists in #Selma, #Alabama, to push for the #VotingRightsAct, & the other to tamp down a forgotten & chaotic attempt by anti-Vietnam protesters to blockade the Pentagon in 1967.
#law #Trump […]
The 12 years spanning 1957 to 1968 were a period of great societal tumult & revolution, especially over #race & the #VietnamWar. Of the 8 deployments, 2 were to enforce #desegregation court orders, most famously at #LittleRock, #Arkansas, in 1957. 4 were to quell riots, 3 of which were part of […]
The dept said #Defense Secy #PeteHegseth directed the activation under #Title10, which allows the president to call the #NationalGuard into federal service when the country is under #invasion or #rebellion, to support “the protection of federal functions, personnel, & property in the LA area," […]
Harbourt also says the proclamation & deployment is against our "broader democratic tradition of separating the #military from #civilian affairs."
#DOJ Shumate has time again. He claims that the part of the #statute #Title10] #Trump cited requiring him to act "through the governor" is satisfied […]
Harbourt addresses the harm caused by #Trump’s federalization of the #California #NationalGuard takes those service members away from assisting in natural disasters & drug interdiction.
He also notes that the proclamation is not limited geographically to #LosAngeles, California nor is it […]
Harbourt:
“Under their view, they can just do the whole process without consulting the governor at all & then slap his name on the top of the [proclamation] after.”
Harbourt notes that #Trump's proclamation even describes the need to "coordinate with the Governors of the States."
Hegseth […]
Harbourt argues that the plain text of the statute title 10] “through the governor” requires consent or at least consultation with the #governor for the president to federalize the #state [#NationalGuard.
He also says other statutes such as the #InsurrectionAct exclude the phrase “through the […]
