Trending

#TrumpAccuser

Latest posts tagged with #TrumpAccuser on Bluesky

Latest Top
Trending

Posts tagged #TrumpAccuser

Preview
Epstein Accountant Blasted for Changing Story About Alleged Trump Accuser The convicted sex offender’s money man was deposed by the House Oversight Committee. Democrats are slamming Jeffrey Epstein’s accountant for his shifting claims about a settlement said to have been p...

Epstein Accountant Blasted for Changing Story About Alleged Trump Accuser
#Epsteinaccountant #Trumpaccuser

opr.news/d82949626031...

Download Now
s.opr.news/cc0e61fa2bal

0 0 0 0
Trump Accuser Story Just Got VERIFIED...
Trump Accuser Story Just Got VERIFIED... YouTube video by Harry Sisson

💥🔥 #EPSTEIN #TrumpAccuser Trump Accuser Story VERIFIED

The 13 Year Old Raped by Trump Proven Truthful in DOJ Report!
youtu.be/hYb60EUAxyE?...

2 2 0 0
“BREAKING: DOJ Files Indicate FBI Sought to Pursue Child Sex Trafficking Investigation Into Trump Based on Accuser’s Account

Bombshell new reporting by journalist Roger Sollenberger

Newly surfaced details from the DOJ’s Epstein files make one thing unmistakably clear: federal authorities took seriously the allegation from an Epstein victim who told the FBI that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her as a child — and sought her cooperation in what appears to have been a potential criminal child sex trafficking investigation.

As first reported by Roger Sollenberger, internal FBI records show the woman was identified as a victim who “claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate.” Former senior DOJ officials say this language strongly indicates that federal investigators approached her about helping pursue a criminal case involving Trump.

In other words, the FBI was not dismissing her account. They were attempting to build a case.

The internal email, dated July 22, 2025 and titled “Names in JE file,” lists Trump first among “positive case hits.” Notably, none of the other prominent names mentioned in Epstein-related materials carry similar annotations suggesting a victim allegation tied to potential prosecution.

This aligns with other reporting showing that the woman held a uniquely sensitive status in the DOJ’s files. She is reportedly the only victim marked “PROTECT SOURCE” — a designation indicating heightened concern about retaliation.

In one released FBI interview, her attorney cited “fear of retaliation” when Trump’s name was raised. That context sheds light on why she may have declined to cooperate further, even as investigators appeared interested in moving forward.

At least four FBI interviews with the accuser exist. Yet only one has been released publicly.

“BREAKING: DOJ Files Indicate FBI Sought to Pursue Child Sex Trafficking Investigation Into Trump Based on Accuser’s Account Bombshell new reporting by journalist Roger Sollenberger Newly surfaced details from the DOJ’s Epstein files make one thing unmistakably clear: federal authorities took seriously the allegation from an Epstein victim who told the FBI that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her as a child — and sought her cooperation in what appears to have been a potential criminal child sex trafficking investigation. As first reported by Roger Sollenberger, internal FBI records show the woman was identified as a victim who “claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate.” Former senior DOJ officials say this language strongly indicates that federal investigators approached her about helping pursue a criminal case involving Trump. In other words, the FBI was not dismissing her account. They were attempting to build a case. The internal email, dated July 22, 2025 and titled “Names in JE file,” lists Trump first among “positive case hits.” Notably, none of the other prominent names mentioned in Epstein-related materials carry similar annotations suggesting a victim allegation tied to potential prosecution. This aligns with other reporting showing that the woman held a uniquely sensitive status in the DOJ’s files. She is reportedly the only victim marked “PROTECT SOURCE” — a designation indicating heightened concern about retaliation. In one released FBI interview, her attorney cited “fear of retaliation” when Trump’s name was raised. That context sheds light on why she may have declined to cooperate further, even as investigators appeared interested in moving forward. At least four FBI interviews with the accuser exist. Yet only one has been released publicly.

The remaining interviews — along with accompanying FBI notes — remain in federal possession but undisclosed, despite the DOJ acknowledging that versions of these materials exist outside the protective order tied to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

The DOJ’s handling of the broader Epstein file release has already drawn intense criticism. The rollout exposed sensitive victim information, including names, identifying details, and reportedly even uncensored images of young females.

…

The remaining interviews — along with accompanying FBI notes — remain in federal possession but undisclosed, despite the DOJ acknowledging that versions of these materials exist outside the protective order tied to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The DOJ’s handling of the broader Epstein file release has already drawn intense criticism. The rollout exposed sensitive victim information, including names, identifying details, and reportedly even uncensored images of young females. …

Adding to the controversy, the DOJ initially published the name of the Trump accuser before later redacting it. Another identifying detail tied to her case reportedly remains unredacted in the public database.

Taken together, the records suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter.

A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.”

Adding to the controversy, the DOJ initially published the name of the Trump accuser before later redacting it. Another identifying detail tied to her case reportedly remains unredacted in the public database. Taken together, the records suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter. A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.”

Post image

“..the #DOJ initially published the name of the #tRumpAccuser before later redacting it.. un-redacted in the public database.. suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter..”

www.facebook.com/share/1FRz1z...

0 1 0 0
“BREAKING: DOJ Files Indicate FBI Sought to Pursue Child Sex Trafficking Investigation Into Trump Based on Accuser’s Account

Bombshell new reporting by journalist Roger Sollenberger

Newly surfaced details from the DOJ’s Epstein files make one thing unmistakably clear: federal authorities took seriously the allegation from an Epstein victim who told the FBI that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her as a child — and sought her cooperation in what appears to have been a potential criminal child sex trafficking investigation.

As first reported by Roger Sollenberger, internal FBI records show the woman was identified as a victim who “claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate.” Former senior DOJ officials say this language strongly indicates that federal investigators approached her about helping pursue a criminal case involving Trump.

In other words, the FBI was not dismissing her account. They were attempting to build a case.

The internal email, dated July 22, 2025 and titled “Names in JE file,” lists Trump first among “positive case hits.” Notably, none of the other prominent names mentioned in Epstein-related materials carry similar annotations suggesting a victim allegation tied to potential prosecution.

This aligns with other reporting showing that the woman held a uniquely sensitive status in the DOJ’s files. She is reportedly the only victim marked “PROTECT SOURCE” — a designation indicating heightened concern about retaliation.

In one released FBI interview, her attorney cited “fear of retaliation” when Trump’s name was raised. That context sheds light on why she may have declined to cooperate further, even as investigators appeared interested in moving forward.

At least four FBI interviews with the accuser exist. Yet only one has been released publicly.

“BREAKING: DOJ Files Indicate FBI Sought to Pursue Child Sex Trafficking Investigation Into Trump Based on Accuser’s Account Bombshell new reporting by journalist Roger Sollenberger Newly surfaced details from the DOJ’s Epstein files make one thing unmistakably clear: federal authorities took seriously the allegation from an Epstein victim who told the FBI that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her as a child — and sought her cooperation in what appears to have been a potential criminal child sex trafficking investigation. As first reported by Roger Sollenberger, internal FBI records show the woman was identified as a victim who “claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate.” Former senior DOJ officials say this language strongly indicates that federal investigators approached her about helping pursue a criminal case involving Trump. In other words, the FBI was not dismissing her account. They were attempting to build a case. The internal email, dated July 22, 2025 and titled “Names in JE file,” lists Trump first among “positive case hits.” Notably, none of the other prominent names mentioned in Epstein-related materials carry similar annotations suggesting a victim allegation tied to potential prosecution. This aligns with other reporting showing that the woman held a uniquely sensitive status in the DOJ’s files. She is reportedly the only victim marked “PROTECT SOURCE” — a designation indicating heightened concern about retaliation. In one released FBI interview, her attorney cited “fear of retaliation” when Trump’s name was raised. That context sheds light on why she may have declined to cooperate further, even as investigators appeared interested in moving forward. At least four FBI interviews with the accuser exist. Yet only one has been released publicly.

The remaining interviews — along with accompanying FBI notes — remain in federal possession but undisclosed, despite the DOJ acknowledging that versions of these materials exist outside the protective order tied to the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

The DOJ’s handling of the broader Epstein file release has already drawn intense criticism. The rollout exposed sensitive victim information, including names, identifying details, and reportedly even uncensored images of young females.

…

The remaining interviews — along with accompanying FBI notes — remain in federal possession but undisclosed, despite the DOJ acknowledging that versions of these materials exist outside the protective order tied to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The DOJ’s handling of the broader Epstein file release has already drawn intense criticism. The rollout exposed sensitive victim information, including names, identifying details, and reportedly even uncensored images of young females. …

Adding to the controversy, the DOJ initially published the name of the Trump accuser before later redacting it. Another identifying detail tied to her case reportedly remains unredacted in the public database.

Taken together, the records suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter.

A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.”

Adding to the controversy, the DOJ initially published the name of the Trump accuser before later redacting it. Another identifying detail tied to her case reportedly remains unredacted in the public database. Taken together, the records suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter. A DOJ spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.”

Post image

“..the #DOJ initially published the name of the #tRumpAccuser before later redacting it.. un-redacted in the public database.. suggest the federal government viewed this woman’s allegation not as peripheral, but as potentially central to a prosecutable matter..”

www.facebook.com/share/1FRz1z...

2 1 0 0

#TrumpAccuser

Is this why the #MadKing did not want the #Epstein files released?

We need a fair investigation of these serious charges.

bsky.app/profile/theb...

1 0 0 0
Preview
Major Update: Andrew, Formerly Prince, Arrested in Connection to Epstein Files as DOJ Caught Deleting Bombshell Interviews With Trump's Accuser via The Parnas Perspective — Good morning everyone. Major developments this morning demand an earlier than usual newsletter. Andrew, formerly known as Prince Andrew, has been detained by British authorities. The Department of Justice has been caught removing key records tied to FBI interviews connected to one of Donald Trump’s accusers in the Epstein files. The United States is moving dangerously close to a war that could last weeks and may begin as soon as this weekend. To those who want me to stop or silence this reportin

Prince Andrew detained by UK authorities; DOJ caught deleting FBI interview records tied to Trump accuser in Epstein case — major legal and political fallout unfolding.

resist47.news — up-to-date resistance news.

#resist47 #PrinceAndrewArrest #EpsteinFiles #DOJCorruption #TrumpAccuser

0 0 0 0

#USA #TRUMP #TRUMPACCUSER #ONCAMERA #TRUMPISANATIONALDISGRACE

18 3 1 0
Post image

The most recent #TrumpAccuser, #ejeancarroll, describes Trump raping her in 90s.
New York Magazine article www.thecut.com/2019/06/donald-trump-ass...
Trump said, “Number one, she’s not my type. Number two, it never happened. It never...

0 0 1 0