Title and abstract for the article. Reads:
Against Recruiting Participants for Psychology Research
Recruiting participants is prevalent in psychology and many social sciences. Although
qualitative approaches are often positioned as critical alternatives to quantitative methods,
underlying assumptions about recruitment are shared across paradigms. These assumptions
are that (a) researchers can determine groups of people with relevant identities,
(b) recruitment can be accomplished by naming such identities, and (c) participants so
recruited will be able to speak to/from these identities. We draw on discursive psychology,
ethnomethodology, and conversation analysis to highlight the metatheoretical
assumptions of recruiting participants. We show how the categorical logic underpinning
recruitment involves problematic power relations. Two case studies illustrate how categories
typically characterized as “demographic” (gender and ethnicity) are negotiated by
participants in social interaction. We argue that studying naturally occurring data decenters
researchers’ agendas and offers a powerful way to realize principles like honoring
voice or lived experience.
Keywords: recruitment, ethics, discursive psychology, social interaction, categories
While recruitment is often represented as simply
the process by which researchers invite and sign
volunteers into the research sample, it is, like all
social activities,underpinnedby a taken-for-granted
inferential infrastructure (Garfinkel, 1967). Rather
than conceptualizing recruitment (solely) as a
problemfor researchers, our discursive psychology
approach allows us to theorize recruitment as a
“two-person problem” (Sacks, 1995, p. xxxviii).
Thus, we approach recruitment as a practical
accomplishment coordinated by both researchers
and (possible) recruits. Interactional studies have
examined instances of recruitment in telephone
surveys (e.g., Nolen & Maynard, 2013) and randomized
control trials (Wade et al., 2009), showing
that it is a complex interactional accomplishment
(e.g., howrecruiters might describe or persuade and
how recipients might decline requests to participate).
Rather than empirically demonstrating
recruitment, in this article, we highlight the categorical
logic underlying recruitment with a
focus on the aspects that involve unequal power
relations. Our aim in providing this brief sketch
is to offer a broader conceptualization of
recruitment and highlight key aspects for researchers
to consider.
oh hey look! what joy! a new (online advance) publication.
my analytic bestie and comrade Dr Emma Tennent and myself offer psychologists a provocative recommendation; don't recruit participants for psychological research. (get in touch if you'd like a copy 💗) #EMCA
psycnet.apa.org/record/2027-...