Trending

#SysRev

Latest posts tagged with #SysRev on Bluesky

Latest Top
Trending

Posts tagged #SysRev

On a blue background is a quote in white and blue text, with the first half of the quote highlighted in yellow for emphasis. The quote reads: “3D technologies, including 3D-printed models and VR/AR platforms, show promise in enhancing surgical training for renal cancer by improving anatomical understanding and procedural skills. These technologies demonstrate good precision and can help assess trainee surgical skill.” Beneath the quote is a stylized illustration of a kidney pair. The quote is attributed to Rubat Baleuri et al. (2025), doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02961-7.

On a blue background is a quote in white and blue text, with the first half of the quote highlighted in yellow for emphasis. The quote reads: “3D technologies, including 3D-printed models and VR/AR platforms, show promise in enhancing surgical training for renal cancer by improving anatomical understanding and procedural skills. These technologies demonstrate good precision and can help assess trainee surgical skill.” Beneath the quote is a stylized illustration of a kidney pair. The quote is attributed to Rubat Baleuri et al. (2025), doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02961-7.

This #SysRev examines 17 studies assessing the usefulness of 3D-printed, VR, & AR surgical simulators for teaching urology trainees to perform renal cancer surgeries, with many focusing on laparoscopic & robot-assisted partial nephrectomies.

#MedEd #MedSky #SurgEd #SurgSky

1 0 1 0
Preview
Computational approaches to treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data: A systematic review Abstract. Major depressive disorder is a heterogeneous diagnostic category with multiple available treatments. With the goal of optimizing treatment selection, researchers are developing computational...

In this 2022 #SysRev, @cognemo.bsky.social et al. at @camhkcni.bsky.social examined computational approaches for treatment response prediction in major depression using brain activity and behavioral data.

direct.mit.edu/netn/article...

2 1 1 0
Post image

🆕 #SysRev Findings ⤵️

Computational simulations have the potential improve accuracy, translation, and drug development, decreasing the risk of late-stage failure and advancing the promise of personalized medicine.

#insilico 🧪 🧬

0 0 1 0
Post image

Catch the free 11/18 #ChoiceWebinar
Our speakers will provide a practical overview of current approaches to integrating #AI into evidence synthesis. They will also share techniques for effective prompt development, as well as key considerations around software selection. ow.ly/Mc2050Xc1yy #sysrev

5 1 0 0
Preview
How long does it take to complete and publish a systematic review of animal studies? - BMC Medical Research Methodology Introduction Conducting a rigorous systematic review of animal studies requires a priori registration of a study protocol. However, it remains unknown how many of these registered studies culminate in publication and how long it takes to complete such a systematic review. Thus, this study had two objectives: (1) to assess the proportion of registered protocols that result in publication, and (2) to determine the time required to complete and publish systematic reviews of animal studies after protocol registration. Methods All available systematic reviews protocols of animal study were manually downloaded from PROSPERO, the international registry of systematic review protocols. Start and completion date as well as topical and demographic data were extracted, complemented by a web-scraping approach. Assessment of publication status was achieved through a systematic literature search. Results From a total of 1,771 protocols, 406 were excluded due to recent start dates. This left 1,365 protocols eligible for the final analysis. Among these, 694 (51%) resulted in a published systematic review. Median time to complete and publish a systematic review was 11.5 months (range: 0.13–44.9 months) and 16.2 months (range: 1.0-49.7 months), respectively. This time was 69% more until submission than anticipated by the authors (6.8 months [range: 0.9–48.0]). Conclusion Only half of registered protocols resulted in publication, suggesting possible publication bias. Authors can expect to complete and publish an animal systematic review within approximately one year.

"How long does it take to complete and publish a systematic review of animal studies?"

This new study says 1️⃣ year.

Bugajska et al. of @crs-uzh.bsky.social also discovered that only half of the protocols resulted in publication.

bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....

#SysRev

1 0 0 0
On the left, a photo of a rat being used in the forced swim test (credit to PETA). On the right, the following text: “New systematic review. Forced swim test papers have “inflated” results. Mirrors previous findings that published animal behavioral experiments are of low quality. ““Incomplete reports have precluded the assessment of internal and external validity of primary studies and accurate estimate of CES [combined effect size] for the FST.”” At the bottom, this citation: “Tamires et al. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000844.”

On the left, a photo of a rat being used in the forced swim test (credit to PETA). On the right, the following text: “New systematic review. Forced swim test papers have “inflated” results. Mirrors previous findings that published animal behavioral experiments are of low quality. ““Incomplete reports have precluded the assessment of internal and external validity of primary studies and accurate estimate of CES [combined effect size] for the FST.”” At the bottom, this citation: “Tamires et al. DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000844.”

New #SystematicReview finds a "remarkable" level of publication bias in experiments using the #ForcedSwimTest for antidepressant screening.

Combined with incomplete reporting, this compromised effect size estimates and raises "concerns about the validity of the FST literature."

🧵

🧪 #sysrev

5 0 1 0
Preview
YouTube Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Cite Source - Great tool for assisting in the development of a search string as well as to evaluate the contribution of different databases and other search methods on the final set of included papers in systematic review. #ESMARconf2025 #medlibs #sysrev

m.youtube.com/watch?v=rBpv...

5 0 1 0

I have no works to share, just a thought/question:

How would the human doing the review know that the AI's 'critical appraisal' was good?

I do lots of #SysRev / #MetaAnalysis. The hardest part, requiring most expertise & independent thought, is the critical appraisal.

How *could* AI deliver that?

2 0 1 0
Post image

7/7
Register here — it's free:
www.bihealth.org/en/translati...
Tag someone who should know about this!

And if you're already working in this space, please send me a DM, I’d love to connect 🤝🏼
Let’s make evidence stronger together.
#SysRev #MetaScience #AI #systematicreviews #research #science

0 0 1 0

3/7
Systematic reviews in preclinical research can:
✅ Reveal trends & contradictions
✅ Identify publication bias
✅ Quantify effect sizes
✅ Evaluate study quality
✅ Guide future experiments
They help us see the forest and the trees.
#EvidenceSynthesis #SysRev

0 0 1 0
Post image

✨Most of us learn how to design experiments.
But how often are we taught to synthesize what already exists?
I’ve recently been exploring #SystematicReview of preclinical studies, and I truly believe more researchers should too.
Here’s why…
🧵1/7
#SysRev #academia #AI #phdlife

2 0 1 0
Preview
HHS is weaponizing evidence-based medicine to falsely portray vaccines as unsafe Last week, HHS announced that all "new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials." Sounds good? Not so fast. This is really a deceptive weaponization of evidence-based medicine

“I’ll start by defining “methodolatry,” after which I’ll explain why it is, either a weakness of the EBM paradigm that is baked in or a fundamentalist version of EBM that ignores medical ethics in favor of supposed scientific rigor.” #medlibs #SysRev sciencebasedmedicine.org/hhs-is-weapo...

6 1 0 0
Preview
Evaluating the performance of common reference laboratory tests for acute dengue diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RT-PCR, NS1 ELISA, and IgM ELISA Dengue fever is listed among the top ten global health threats by WHO. Prompt identification of dengue virus can guide clinical management and outbrea…

I'm pleased to announce i've a new paper published. It's a review on dengue diagnosis I did the searches for. It's part of the @lshtm.bsky.social FIEBRE project www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/cen....
Available on the Lancet Microbe at www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
#sysrev #dengue #diagnosis

5 2 0 0
A table with three columns: 'Term,' 'Defining aspect,' and 'Examples.' It defines three terms: 'Grey literature' (not controlled by commercial publishing organizations, examples include internal reports, working papers, newsletters), 'Grey data' (user-generated, web-based, examples include tweets, blogs, Facebook status updates), and 'Grey information' (informally published or not published at all, examples include meeting notes, emails, personal memories).

A table with three columns: 'Term,' 'Defining aspect,' and 'Examples.' It defines three terms: 'Grey literature' (not controlled by commercial publishing organizations, examples include internal reports, working papers, newsletters), 'Grey data' (user-generated, web-based, examples include tweets, blogs, Facebook status updates), and 'Grey information' (informally published or not published at all, examples include meeting notes, emails, personal memories).

When we talk about grey literature, do we also consider grey information and grey data? I usually define it as conference papers, dissertations, and preprints only.

A worthwhile read on this topic: doi.org/10.1186/s136... #sysrev #systematicreview

4 0 1 0

PRECAUCIÓN al usar el filtro en #PubMed para excluir animales:
‘exp animals/ not humans.xn--sh-o2t
Desde que la NLM implantó la indexación totalmente automatizada de #Medline el uso de este filtro excluye inadecuadamente los estudios humanos
#medlibs #SysRev
🔗https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2025.1972

2 1 0 0
Preview
Development of Prompt Templates for Large Language Model–Driven Screening in Systematic Reviews | Annals of Internal Medicine Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) are hindered by the initial rigorous article screen, which delays access to reliable information synthesis. Objective: To develop generic prompt templates for larg...

🧐#Prompts genéricos para la selección de resúmenes y textos completos basados en #LLMs y su uso en #RevisionesSistemáticas
👉Alta sensibilidad y especificidad
👉Ahorro de tiempo y dinero
🔗 doi.org/10.7326/ANNA...
#SysRev #InteligenciaArtificial #medlibs

4 0 0 0
"Searched PubMed and MEDLINE" | Systematic Review Common Mistakes | Methods Monday
"Searched PubMed and MEDLINE" | Systematic Review Common Mistakes | Methods Monday YouTube video by Carrie Price

Reviewer 1 was playing the part of Reviewer 2 today. 10 changes to address in our #SysRev. 2 was “why didn’t you search PubMed, too?” Dear reviewer, please watch: "Searched PubMed and MEDLINE" | Systematic Review Common Mistakes | Methods Monday youtu.be/5lxlO7vCqyY 💕 @carrieprice.bsky.social

11 2 1 1
Preview
Unlocking the potential of trees to improve health and livelihoods | LSHTM Unlocking the potential of trees to improve health and livelihoods | LSHTM

New paper 📣
A systematic review that I did the searches for has been published. I'm really pleased with this one. It turned into an unexpected monster. #sysrev #medlibs
Press release: www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/cen...
Paper: doi.org/10.1016/S254...

19 3 3 0
Post image

Papel estratégico de bibliotecario en las revisiones sistemáticas
#SysRev #medlibs

4 4 0 0
Post image

Aytac, S., Scheinfeld, L., & Tran, C. Y. (2025). How to do a #systematicreview. The Reference Librarian, 1–12.
#SysRev #medlibs
🔗 doi.org/10.1080/0276...

2 0 0 0

I'm aiming to try to keep this to work-related stuff only (let's see how long that lasts). So search-geeks, #sysrev nerds, and public health #infospecialists, hello.

5 0 2 0
Considerations for conducting psychological research in lower- and middle-income countries - Communications Psychology Beginning to conduct psychological research in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is daunting. Where do you start? In this reflexive commentary, we raise three critical questions that research...

Thoughtful reflection on conducting #PsySciSky #psychology research in #LMIC, esp if from #HIC. Most telling point for me: 1/3 studies in #sysrev about experiences of loneliness in #LMIC were authored solely by those at #HIC institutions.https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00168-4

4 1 0 0
Preview
a group of people are sitting in a park with a white truck in the background . ALT: a group of people are sitting in a park with a white truck in the background .

New EBSCO Interface. Share your best GIFs. #medlibs #systematicreviews #sysrev

6 0 5 0

I would like to think about ways to counteract this. How to convince #SysRev teams that an extra two weeks (I'd say, after #peerreview and #revisions) are worth the wait?

#medlibs #peerReview #press #systematicreviews

6 0 3 0
https://universityofgalway-ie.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN__jNWtWT_RCqgvVxzVHf9WA#/registration

たぶんムスコの練習日&疲れ果ててるのでリアルでは聞けないですが。
TARCiS声明のウェビナー
#TARCiSstatement
#sysrev
Webinar: Dr Julian Hirt & Dr Christian Appenzeller-Herzog - Guidance on terminology, application and reporting of citation searching: The TARCiS Statement
t.co/MqVO7wzYDg

0 0 0 0

デジタルデータを用いたパーソナリティの予測に関する #sysrev & 2つの #メタ分析 。人間が Big Five特性を予測する場合,機械学習で予測する場合のいずれにおいても,中程度の関連(収束的妥当性)が示された。

Hinds & Joinson (2024). Digital data and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human perception and computer prediction https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000430

#サイコロabst

0 0 0 0

To inform the shift in #HIV/#AIDS research funding away from animals, #systematicreviews will be critical. Stay tuned for the results of the #sysrev we funded on whether monkeys can accurately predict the efficacy of HIV vaccines in humans - expected in 2025! www.peta.org/blog/netherl... #AIDSday

1 0 0 0

動機づけ調整方略の種類、使用頻度、その先行要因やアウトカムに関する #sysrev#メタ分析

Villar et al. (2024). What are the principal and most effective strategies for motivational self-regulation? A systematic review and meta-analyses https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102480

#サイコロabst

0 0 0 0

Hi everyone, just moved apps and hoping to recapture some of the magic of old Twitter. I'm an academic into #nutrition, evidence synthesis (particularly #sysrev), dietary assessment, food labelling. Keen on any suggestions of who to follow.
Can promise occasional dog photos in return 🐕

7 1 1 0

Differences in search strategies and corresponding outputs between matching Cochrane Reviews, HTA reports and other
systematic reviews.
#HTA
#sysrev
rsuedulv-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/person...

1 0 1 0